I'm a Hardcore Capitalist, Yet Universal Medicare Represents the Best Solution for US Healthcare
Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.
Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.
Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly
Based on a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.
Now the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.
When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.
The Way National Health Insurance Would Work
A national health insurance program would require contributions from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.
Does this seem like a lot? Not if you compare it to what the typical American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.
Execution in the US
For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like much of our government's military, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.
Advantages for Entrepreneurs
Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).
It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.
Capitalist Perspective
I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.
Considering Challenges
Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.
Time for Realistic Evaluation
We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.